The on-line form presented to the students is available here and the raw data is here.
21 students responded
Q1. How confident are you in the following knowledge areas?
Not at all | Somewhat | Moderately | Very | |
Genetics (mendelian, quantitative, population, molecular) | 0 | 4 | 13 | 4 |
Genomics | 2 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
Experimental design and statistics | 2 | 6 | 9 | 4 |
Data management (collection, analysis, database) | 1 | 5 | 11 | 4 |
Bioinformatics | 7 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
Factors in crop plants that impact productivity | 1 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
Selection theory and techniques | 2 | 10 | 6 | 3 |
Methods for breeding in selfing and outcrossing systems | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 |
Plant breeding strategies (traditional, molecular, physiological) | 2 | 7 | 9 | 3 |
Teaching strategies (Inquiry-based learning approaches) | 11 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
Genomic selection (experiment set up, analysis) | 7 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
UAS-HTP (operating equipment, experiment set up, data analysis) | 9 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
Q2. Are there any other knowledge areas in plant breeding you feel are important?
- Experimental design based on budgets. What realistically you can accomplish as a breeder with certain funding brackets.
- How to connect with industry to develop new market class specific products.
- Maybe economics and variety protection.
- Genome assembly and pangenomics
- gene editing and transgenics
Q3. What are three knowledge areas you feel most confident in?
Genetics (mendelian, quantitative, population, molecular) | 11 |
Genomics | 4 |
Experimental design and statistics | 7 |
Data management (collection, analysis, database) | 6 |
Bioinformatics | 5 |
Factors in crop plants that impact productivity | 6 |
Selection theory and techniques | 3 |
Methods for breeding in selfing and outcrossing systems | 3 |
Plant breeding strategies (traditional, molecular, physiological) | 6 |
Teaching strategies (Inquiry-based learning approaches) | 2 |
Genomic selection (experiment set up, analysis) | 4 |
UAS-HTP (operating equipment, experiment set up, data analysis) | 7 |
Other (please specify) |
Q4. How confident do you feel in the following skill sets?
Not at all | Somewhat | Moderately | Very | |
Work cooperatively | 0 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
Design experiments | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
Define and solve problems | 0 | 4 | 14 | 3 |
Manage data | 0 | 4 | 13 | 4 |
Consider alternative hypotheses | 2 | 5 | 11 | 3 |
Communicate your scientific ideas orally | 0 | 7 | 12 | 2 |
Make phenotypic selections | 2 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
Molecular techniques | 7 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
UAV-HTP techniques | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
Genomic selection techniques | 7 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
Observe and interpret results | 1 | 3 | 13 | 4 |
Make marker assisted selections | 8 | 1 | 9 | 3 |
Utilize SNPs or genotype by sequencing (GBS) | 8 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
Statistical analysis | 1 | 9 | 7 | 4 |
Choose parents and make crosses | 2 | 9 | 6 | 4 |
Make genome wide selections | 6 | 9 | 5 | 1 |
Write scientific papers and grants | 7 | 9 | 5 | 0 |
Q5. Are there any other skill sets you feel are important in your field of study?
- presentation skills
- Data Analytics
- R Script
Q6. What are the three skill sets you feel most confident in?
Work cooperatively | 15 |
Design experiments | 4 |
Define and solve problems | 7 |
Manage data | 2 |
Consider alternative hypotheses | 1 |
Communicate your scientific ideas orally | 5 |
Make phenotypic selections | 6 |
Molecular techniques | 2 |
UAV-HTP techniques | 5 |
Genomic selection techniques | 3 |
Observe and interpret results | 1 |
Make marker assisted selections | 2 |
Utilize SNPs or genotype by sequencing (GBS) | 3 |
Statistical analysis | 3 |
Choose parents and make crosses | 2 |
Make genome wide selections | 1 |
Write scientific papers and grants | 1 |
Other (please specify) |
Q7. What percentage of your time did you use the following skill sets in the past year?
0-25% | 25-50% | 50-75% | 75-100% | |
Work cooperatively | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
Design experiments | 9 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
Define and solve problems | 5 | 2 | 9 | 5 |
Manage data | 3 | 3 | 12 | 3 |
Consider alternative hypotheses | 7 | 8 | 5 | 1 |
Communicate your scientific ideas orally | 12 | 3 | 6 | 0 |
Make phenotypic selections | 11 | 4 | 5 | 1 |
Molecular techniques | 14 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
UAV-HTP techniques | 11 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
Genomic selection techniques | 10 | 9 | 1 | 1 |
Observe and interpret results | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
Make marker assisted selections | 13 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
Utilize SNPs or genotype by sequencing (GBS) | 10 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
Statistical analysis | 4 | 6 | 8 | 3 |
Choose parents and make crosses | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
Write scientific papers or grants | 9 | 6 | 6 | 0 |
Make genome wide selections | 16 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
Q8. How important do you believe the following methods are in educating graduate students?
Not at all | Somewhat | Moderately | Very | |
One-on-one mentoring | 0 | 1 | 5 | 15 |
Collaboration with faculty other than your advisor | 0 | 3 | 11 | 7 |
Collaboration with other graduate students at your institution | 0 | 4 | 10 | 7 |
Collaboration with graduate students from OTHER institutions | 0 | 8 | 9 | 4 |
Teaching experience | 1 | 9 | 8 | 3 |
Independent development of hypothesis | 1 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
Independent development of research designs | 1 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
Field experience | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
Laboratory experience | 0 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
Exposure to diverse research methods and tools | 0 | 3 | 6 | 12 |
Experience writing grants | 2 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
Experience presenting results (meetings, papers) | 2 | 0 | 7 | 12 |
Exposure to plant breeding students from different ethnic backgrounds | 2 | 3 | 9 | 7 |
Q9. In your opinion, what are the three best methods for educating graduate students?
One-on-one mentoring | 18 |
Collaboration with faculty other than your advisor | 4 |
Collaboration with other graduate students at your institution | 7 |
Collaboration with graduate students from OTHER institutions | 4 |
Teaching experience | 3 |
Independent development of hypothesis | 2 |
Independent development of research designs | 4 |
Field experience | 6 |
Laboratory experience | 4 |
Exposure to diverse research methods and tools | 8 |
Experience writing grants | 1 |
Experience presenting results (meetings, papers) | 3 |
Exposure to plant breeding students from different ethnic backgrounds | 1 |
Other (please specify) | 1 |
This comment is more in regards to Q10 & Q11: I have become less motivated to pursue a career in plant breeding not from lack of interest but because I am a female with disabilities and frankly the job prospects looked too slim for me; the bioinformatics field seemed much more likely to hire someone like me.
Q10. To what extend are you interested in the plant breeding field? (0 to 10 scale)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
Q11. How motivated do you feel in pursuing a career in plant breeding? (0 to 10 scale)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
Q12. Please indicate the percentage of time you participated in the following activities over the past year
0-25% | 25-50% | 50-75% | 75-100% | |
Mentoring an undergraduate student | 11 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
Inquiry-based learning approached | 4 | 9 | 7 | 1 |
Planning research | 3 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
Working in the field | 1 | 9 | 7 | 4 |
Conducting research | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 |
Being mentored by your advisor | 4 | 10 | 5 | 2 |
Participating in the online community | 11 | 7 | 3 | 0 |
Gathering, analyzing, and managing data | 2 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
Problem solving | 2 | 5 | 10 | 4 |
Q13. Please indicate the value of these activities for understanding the profession of plant breeding
Not at all | Somewhat | Moderately | Very | |
Mentoring an undergraduate student | 3 | 7 | 11 | 0 |
Inquiry-based learning approached | 0 | 5 | 13 | 3 |
Planning research | 0 | 1 | 6 | 14 |
Working in the field | 0 | 2 | 5 | 14 |
Conducting research | 0 | 1 | 6 | 14 |
Being mentored by your advisor | 0 | 4 | 9 | 8 |
Participating in the online community | 4 | 9 | 8 | 0 |
Gathering, analyzing, and managing data | 0 | 1 | 5 | 15 |
Problem solving | 0 | 2 | 4 | 15 |
Q14. Please indicate how often you have interacted with the following types of people in the past year.
Never | Once a year or less | Once every three months or less | Once a month or less | Once a week or less | More than once a week | |
Other undergraduates at my institution | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
Students in my lab | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 |
Other graduate students at my institution | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
Students from other institutions in the US | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
Students from minority serving institutions | 3 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
Students from institutions outside the US | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
My advisor | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 14 |
Researchers at my institution | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 4 |
Researchers from minority serving institutions | 7 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Researchers from other institutions in the US | 5 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
Researchers outside of the US | 7 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Researchers from businesses and/or private companies | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Q15. Please indicate what was the most prevalent topic of your interactions with your contemporaries?
Class assignments/ classes in general | Trouble shooting research | Collaborations (i.e. working on a research project) | Social | Mentoring/ being mentored | Interpreting research results | Theory of genetics or breeding | Job prospects and professional networking | Other | |
My mentee | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Students in my lab | 3 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other graduate students at my institution | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Students from other institutions in the US | 0 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Students from minority serving institutions | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Students from institutions outside the US | 0 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
My advisor | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Researchers at my institution | 1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Researchers from minority serving institutions | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Researchers from other institutions in the US | 1 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Researchers outside of the US | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Researchers from businesses and/or private companies | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
Q16. What is your gender?
Male | 10 |
Female | 10 |
Prefer Not To Answer | 1 |
Q17. Are you a US citizen?
Yes | 14 |
No | 7 |
Q18. Is English your primary language?
Yes | 14 |
No | 7 |
Q19. How many years have you been funded as a graduate student by the WheatCAP grant?
- Less than 1 year: 7
- 1 year: 9
- 2 years: 2
- 3 years: 1
- 4 years: 0
- 5 years: 1
Q20. How can we improve the WheatCAP education program?
- Continue to offer online resources and workshops to help students better understand their field as well as learn how to solve problems that may arise in their research projects.
- Collaborative activities outside of our research. Not a project but maybe fun prompts like “Where do you see food security in 100 years and the role of plant breeding”.
- By interacting with other students and sharing the knowledge i know to them and how we work to solve a problem.
- Keep pushing advisors/researchers to mentor and teach graduate students!
- I am excited for opportunities to meet other graduate students
- Greater focus on utilizing whole genome assembly resources
- Train students to apply for grants.
- I may answer it accurately later.
- Providing more workshops
- More training sessions
Q21. Suggestions for future education activities?
- Bring in reps of CIMMYT, other companies/organizations that are potential employers so we can be set up for future job opportunities!
- Workshops on different topics such as writing grant proposals, GS, HTP, breeding methods, and so one.
- Inviting speakers from CIMMYT, John Innes, CSIRO or others could give new perspective to students.
- Fun prompts in breakout rooms almost like a panel so we can hear from different students.
- Seminar every week where one student give a presentation about his research work
- Wheat quality, and the different market classes across the US
- once a month journal club
- More training workshop.
- not now
- see Q20